|
Post by jimc on Apr 9, 2018 18:31:01 GMT
Bro?
Awesome hipster dbag speak.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Apr 9, 2018 18:47:30 GMT
You always say how great soccer is I never do this here. I think maybe one time at the old boards there were some of us discussing results of various soccer games, but that's about as much as I've ever voiced my opinion on soccer. The only other time I can think of is when you tried these antics in your last tantrum on this subject, and I said soccer should also get rid of the offside rule. Learn to read, bro. So when you said hockey should adopt an off-side rule LIKE soccer, what did you mean?
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Apr 9, 2018 18:48:09 GMT
I'm just glad you finally cited me for using a word I actually used. It may have only been one word and no more than that....but I'll take it.
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Apr 9, 2018 19:01:36 GMT
I never do this here. I think maybe one time at the old boards there were some of us discussing results of various soccer games, but that's about as much as I've ever voiced my opinion on soccer. The only other time I can think of is when you tried these antics in your last tantrum on this subject, and I said soccer should also get rid of the offside rule. Learn to read, bro. So when you said hockey should adopt an off-side rule LIKE soccer, what did you mean? Oh, and this is a classic case of you making up your own shit when I type. I certainly never said hockey should adopt soccer's offside rule. If anything, soccer might be better off taking hockey's. Soccer's is a wreck. And it sounds like for the World Cup they want to institute replay reviews for offside calls so soccer is taking the WRONG part of hockey's rules. That's going to make things even worse as we nitpick if the guys fingernail was on the other side of the d-man or not. Now, what I ACTUALLY said in the past is the in the various indoor soccer leagues I play in, offside is completely removed from the game. The field size is comparable to a hockey rink. It's 5v5 plus goalies, change lines on the fly. And there are rarely cherry pickers. If there is one, the other team drops one d-man back to handle it, making it completely ineffective. That's all I ever said there. Alternative suggestions I'd be open to with offside changes: 1.) Once the puck is in the offensive zone, if it leaves, everyone has to clear the zone before being allowed to re-enter. But you are allowed to be in there before the puck goes in. This accomplishes two things: A) It still makes maintaining the zone important and B) It helps prevent teams from having the entire length of the ice to kill time when they have a lead. 2.) Remove offsides, but re-institute the two-line pass. That cuts out your cherry picking problem. Or maybe combine the two.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Apr 9, 2018 19:31:04 GMT
Oh i see...we are picking nits...indoor soccer...not soccer in general...still an idiotic idea....thank you for clarifying.
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Apr 9, 2018 19:51:12 GMT
I wouldn't really call that nitpicking, but carry on.
|
|
|
Post by Giovi on Apr 9, 2018 21:24:15 GMT
Remember that time I said you just read what you want to read when we discuss Kane? I used the word "douchebag." I think someone else said rapist though. But oh no.... I've betrayed my knowledge.... Anyway, keep armdancing to Patrick Sharp's super important A to distract you from the shitty season the Hawks just had. Guys, did you see? He was tearing up because Kane did a thing! (Probably had nothing to do with the realization in general that his career was coming to an end; it was definitely all Kane.) i still havent figured out if your a somewhat skilled troll or a complete idiot.
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Apr 9, 2018 21:52:31 GMT
I'm wondering how many of your guys are proficient at reading.
You're trying to call me out as a troll/idiot in a post where I said I used the word "Douchebag" in response to Jim claiming I said "rapist?"
That's not how this works, no.
|
|
|
Post by brendan on Apr 10, 2018 1:16:58 GMT
You idiots are just distracted.. hawks rule Kane sucks. Rapist prick.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Apr 10, 2018 3:42:55 GMT
Ban Brendan!!!!
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Apr 10, 2018 3:45:31 GMT
Remember that time I said you just read what you want to read when we discuss Kane? I used the word "douchebag." I think someone else said rapist though. But oh no.... I've betrayed my knowledge.... Anyway, keep armdancing to Patrick Sharp's super important A to distract you from the shitty season the Hawks just had. Guys, did you see? He was tearing up because Kane did a thing! (Probably had nothing to do with the realization in general that his career was coming to an end; it was definitely all Kane.) i still havent figured out if your a somewhat skilled troll or a complete idiot. I really dont see any hint of the modicum of intelligence necessary to be an effective troll.
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Apr 10, 2018 10:35:10 GMT
I understand if you divide Kane's total points post-raping with the number of open hand smacks Bobby Hull delivered to his wife, you get the number of poles JT will eventually crash into with his car. The team closest to that number in soccer's charts has a 38.3 percent chance of winning the Stanley Cup.
|
|
|
Post by gadi on Apr 10, 2018 16:45:35 GMT
I understand if you divide Kane's total points post-raping with the number of open hand smacks Bobby Hull delivered to his wife Sadly, I'm guessing the result of your equation would be well below 1 .
|
|
|
Post by lari on Apr 10, 2018 17:00:38 GMT
I understand if you divide Kane's total points post-raping with the number of open hand smacks Bobby Hull delivered to his wife Sadly, I'm guessing the result of your equation would be well below 1 . You're thinking of closed fist not open hand.
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Apr 10, 2018 17:04:43 GMT
It's not the easiest formula to crack.
|
|