|
Post by lari on Nov 4, 2018 18:42:31 GMT
I missed the first two minutes and the flames were on a five minute major? Wtf? I don't think that was worth a major. It looked nasty, but only because the Flame turned at the last moment. Keith didn't come with speed or even create much of an impact. It must have been shocking that a Hawk player even finished a check. For as shitty as the Hawks were (how mant fucking shots did they generate - at some point in the third it said 11), I think the D did a great job playing with five men and keeping the Flames from wrecking the Hawks completely. Hawks forwards surely didn't care enough to help by trying to keep the play away from their zone. Crow played well, and must be thinking about going back on smack to get away from this.
|
|
|
Post by profile1 on Nov 4, 2018 19:33:26 GMT
Hard to take away many positives from this game. Notwithstanding Keith's early exit, if the Flames could have hit a few open net the results would be even worse.
The teams play against the Flames is probably is pretty true representative of the talent, character, discipline and direction of this Hawk team. Wait until the Hawks play more of the better divisional teams. The call of last in the division is right on.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Nov 4, 2018 19:57:19 GMT
How appropriate it was Frogurt who scored the GWG. If only the thread title was Chickenshithawks, it'd have been all perfect.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Nov 4, 2018 20:56:26 GMT
Hawks had 11 shots through 2 periods...and were somehow up 3-2...si the natural course of action? Give up 21 shots in the 3rd and be used as floor mops. That was simply appalling.
As mentioned above...5-3 completely flattered the Hawks
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Nov 5, 2018 1:24:39 GMT
Hawks had 11 shots through 2 periods...and were somehow up 3-2...si the natural course of action? Give up 21 shots in the 3rd and be used as floor mops. That was simply appalling. As mentioned above...5-3 completely flattered the Hawks You misspelled 'Flattened'
|
|
|
Post by Pez68 on Nov 5, 2018 3:36:06 GMT
That should not have even been a penalty on Keith, let alone 5 and a fucking game. Kid turned right back into him, and crouched down. That's 100% on him.
|
|
|
Post by brendan on Nov 5, 2018 5:43:52 GMT
3 goal 3rd seems like the 2004 hawks are back....fuck off... maybe someone should do their due diligence n ask q b stan a tough question. like why do u trot out a 30th ranked pp. with kane, maybe the most dangerous 1v1 player in hockey.... poor conky. man fuck... i feel for him.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Nov 5, 2018 6:02:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lari on Nov 5, 2018 6:12:16 GMT
The Hawks don't play again until Thursday. Plenty of time to mull over thia game, and this current losing streak.
Of course, Q will probably just hold optional practices (where he won't show up himself either) in between mandatory days off.
|
|
|
Post by brendan on Nov 5, 2018 7:07:36 GMT
this story doesnt do anything but gloss over the game. how did hawks not have a player in box isnt that a referee problem too ? u just get the 17 other players available ??
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Nov 5, 2018 13:17:26 GMT
Seriously...complaining about that penalty just glosses over what an epic fail this team is, and lets them off the hook for just a sad pathetic effort. This roster is just chock full of useless turds.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Nov 5, 2018 15:19:14 GMT
The Hawks don't play again until Thursday. Plenty of time to mull over thia game, and this current losing streak. Of course, Q will probably just hold optional practices (where he won't show up himself either) in between mandatory days off. He can do another Binny's spot.
|
|
|
Post by jrsamu on Nov 5, 2018 15:21:10 GMT
The Hawks have become about the easiest teams to play against in the league. So far, other than about five forwards, the rest are pretty interchangeable with the Icehogs, and that says everything.
They did show me something to take the lead without Keith, but then the team defense absolutely could not hold off the inevitable 3rd period rush from Calgary. Starting with the forwards - the coverage at times is vintage early 2000s Blackhawks. Three guys skating to the puck leaving massive spaces undefended.
|
|
|
Post by Giovi on Nov 5, 2018 17:17:25 GMT
this story doesnt do anything but gloss over the game. how did hawks not have a player in box isnt that a referee problem too ? u just get the 17 other players available ?? No fault of the refs at all. Its up to the coach to put, or not put, a man in the box at the beginning, or at any stoppage in play during the penalty.
|
|
|
Post by brendan on Nov 5, 2018 19:26:23 GMT
so no one has to serve a penalty ? they can choose to use the reamining 17 skaters ?
|
|