|
Post by Merpes on Jun 19, 2019 11:49:48 GMT
Byram all the way. How often do guys like Keith, Doughty, etc. become available? They don’t. Karlsson is an exception because he was on a team that likely would have been contracted under any other circumstance. There is a bust factor with everyone, but you can’t pass up the chance of a 1st pair dman. The Hawks picked up a 2nd line center off the scrap heap just last year for comparison. Blues got ROR for peanuts.
Young defenders are the premium currency in the NHL. Don’t flub this up, Stun!
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jun 19, 2019 12:19:00 GMT
To be fair to Yak, Edmonton is a death sentence for most young players. You need to be drafted into the right situation to have a good chance of success. To be fair to Edmonton, Yak never showed anything much and he is also a prick.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jun 19, 2019 13:09:56 GMT
To be fair to Yak, Edmonton is a death sentence for most young players. You need to be drafted into the right situation to have a good chance of success. and Yak was lazy so....................
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jun 19, 2019 13:11:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jun 19, 2019 14:09:25 GMT
I'd take Dach ahead of Zegras.
|
|
|
Post by Pain101 on Jun 19, 2019 14:19:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jun 19, 2019 16:31:19 GMT
Byram Zegras Turcotte Cozens Dach for me.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jun 19, 2019 16:51:35 GMT
Wiz...fucking clown
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jun 19, 2019 17:43:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tedbulley on Jun 19, 2019 18:21:02 GMT
The pick is Byram or Stain has failed. Dont you ever have anything nice to say about the hawks? The Hawks yes, Stain no!
|
|
|
Post by Giovi on Jun 19, 2019 18:53:13 GMT
Byram Zegras Turcotte Cozens Dach for me.
Depending on the day, i might have Turcotte ahead of Zegras, but otherwise thats my order too.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jun 19, 2019 19:14:06 GMT
I am leaning towards taking Dach ahead of most of the options. He seems like a first line center to me.
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Jun 19, 2019 19:41:50 GMT
The question is, is it worth trading down a spot or two to get who they want or could any of them come off the table at 3, 4, or even 5?
I'd hate for stain to trade down a few spots and then not get his guy, which would be very "Stan" imo.
|
|
|
Post by tedbulley on Jun 19, 2019 20:07:54 GMT
The question is, is it worth trading down a spot or two to get who they want or could any of them come off the table at 3, 4, or even 5? I'd hate for stain to trade down a few spots and then not get his guy, which would be very "Stan" imo. If they're not taking Byram (which would be stupid) then you know there are teams looking to trade up to get Byram. Why not trade down 2 or 3 spots and still get the guy you want and extra assets?
|
|
|
Post by brendan on Jun 19, 2019 20:25:35 GMT
with no consensus #3-10pick, probably not much 'extra' coming with moving down 2 or 3 notches.
only way is if a team was sold on bryam and the hawks werent sold on anyone.
|
|