|
Post by khawk20 on Oct 13, 2017 10:38:56 GMT
How the fuck was that not offside? Absolutely fucking brutal! Fixed that for you. Center Ice off of Bell had the Wild commentators for a Hawks homegame on our feed last night. What. The. Fuck. Konroyd must be boring the piss out of the guys making that call. Seriously it makes no sense not to have the local coverage be your feed, no? Fucking idiots. Also mark me down in the "pulling the goalie only down two goals with 4+ minutes left" as mostly stupid.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Oct 13, 2017 11:01:01 GMT
How the fuck was that not offside? Absolutely fucking brutal! Fixed that for you. Center Ice off of Bell had the Wild commentators for a Hawks homegame on our feed last night. What. The. Fuck. Konroyd must be boring the piss out of the guys making that call. Seriously it makes no sense not to have the local coverage be your feed, no? Fucking idiots. Also mark me down in the "pulling the goalie only down two goals with 4+ minutes left" as mostly stupid. Thank God the Cubs game took so long...I WAS going to watch the Hawks this morning...Thank you. And pulling the goalie that early is Bold, Stoopid.....
|
|
|
Post by lari on Oct 13, 2017 11:57:00 GMT
I don't have a problem with that offside ruling. Zucker doesn't even touch the puck, Seabrook is just clumsy. And accidentally propelling the puck to your own zone doesn't seem like it's a correct way to prevent an attack, so... good goal. I however hate those stupid video replays, and the Hawks would have been better off just not challenging. Suddenly they were down 3-1 because of the DoG penalty.
Only challenge a call if it's blatant. This was borderline, and I hate seeing goals disallowed anyway.
Highlight of the night:
Hayden is my new favourite Blackhawk, along with Hartman.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Oct 13, 2017 14:57:32 GMT
Can anyone tell me who the faggots on the ice were last night and what happened to the Hawks?
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Oct 13, 2017 15:23:00 GMT
Seabrook skate knocking the puck in negated the off side. Except, that's not how the rule works. The defending team has to PASS the puck into their zone(intentionally) to negate offside. They fucked that up.
The defending team did pass the puck into their own zone though. The pass started with Toews in the offensive zone. It took a crazy bounce off the boards/ice (not off the Wild) and skipped over Seabrook's stick. Seabrook goes for a dive to swat the puck away, misses, spins around, and kicks the puck into his zone. But this was still off Toews's pass. A Wild player still hasn't touched the puck. It was the right call, regardless of Seabrook's circus act.
www.nhl.com/video/stewart-scores-on-a-two-on-one/t-290862062/c-53440303
|
|
|
Post by lari on Oct 13, 2017 16:10:56 GMT
Yeah, what soccer said. Toews to Seabrook. Zucker or the Wild don't do anything with the puck so they simply can't be offside.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2017 16:36:34 GMT
Seabrook did not kick the puck!!! He was prone on the ice. The puck hit his skate. So you can shoot the puck off a D man in the Neutral zone to your teammate who is in already in the Attacking zone and it won't be offsides.
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Oct 13, 2017 16:52:05 GMT
So you can shoot the puck off a D man in the Neutral zone to your teammate who is in already in the Attacking zone and it won't be offside.Fixed.
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Oct 13, 2017 17:17:31 GMT
I guess everyone has unanimously decided that Toews didn't actually pass the puck back into the zone where it then bounced off Seabrook in the process.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Oct 13, 2017 17:35:30 GMT
Seabrook did not kick the puck!!! He was prone on the ice. The puck hit his skate. So you can shoot the puck off a D man in the Neutral zone to your teammate who is in already in the Attacking zone and it won't be offsides. So... Toews was offside? Faceoff goes to the Wild blueline, right? Because the Wild never touched the puck. They didn't move it past the Hawks blue line. The Hawks did.
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Oct 13, 2017 17:42:31 GMT
Exactly. I think the call would have been reversed if a Wild player tried to send the puck up ice. Or even if Toews's original pass deflected off the Wild player and then went down the ice.
But Seabrook knocked it into his own zone while his team was trying to make a play. This is pretty simple and shouldn't even be a controversy. I don't blame for getting Q duped on the challenge. But I don't understand how the NHL has failed so hard in communicating the explanation. And I don't get how nobody in the media is picking up on this. Too much scrutiny on if Seabrook passed the puck back without consideration for who had the puck prior to Seabrook.
|
|
|
Post by markwojo on Oct 13, 2017 17:51:24 GMT
Upon further review....that is not off sides because the Wild did absolutely nothing to get the puck into the zone. Did Capt Seriousness get an assist to go with his minus?
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Oct 13, 2017 21:34:41 GMT
Hayden fractured Folignos face with that punch last night.
Lucky or not that's a helluva punch.
|
|
|
Post by profile1 on Oct 14, 2017 0:03:09 GMT
Hayden fractured Folignos face with that punch last night. Lucky or not that's a helluva punch. In fact just read that 3 Wild were out as a result of the Hawk game: "Coyle was placed on long-term injured reserve on Friday with a fractured right fibula. After having surgery at TRIA Orthopaedic Center in Bloomington, Coyle is expected to miss the next 6-8 weeks. Niederreiter was placed on injured reserve with a high ankle sprain and is expected to miss a minimum of three weeks. Foligno was not placed on injured reserve but will have a surgical procedure on Sunday to repair a left facial fracture. He will miss a minimum of one week." -Dan Myers @1danmyers/Wild.com Yes, Hayden gains respect as someone 'tough to play against' ... especially when he's breaking their jaw!
|
|
|
Post by Pez68 on Oct 14, 2017 4:24:17 GMT
Well, with all that taken into account...good loss!
|
|