|
Post by gadi on Jul 27, 2019 4:36:18 GMT
I recall them saying because in March or so that the plan was for him to stay in Juniors, but if he's ready to step up the the pro level, I'm not going to complain.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jul 27, 2019 9:50:33 GMT
He isnt cracking the top 4
So did you want him in a 5-6 or 7 role?
Obviously not a 7...and limited minutes wont be much help in his development.
The third pair is probably Murphy and Seabrook...which is aWful...but you're overpaying each of them...so they play.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jul 27, 2019 10:41:03 GMT
He isnt cracking the top 4 So did you want him in a 5-6 or 7 role? Obviously not a 7...and limited minutes wont be much help in his development. The third pair is probably Murphy and Seabrook...which is aWful...but you're overpaying each of them...so they play. The team has only two RHD's. No way do the two play together. Murphy is in the top 4.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jul 27, 2019 12:45:12 GMT
He isnt cracking the top 4 So did you want him in a 5-6 or 7 role? Obviously not a 7...and limited minutes wont be much help in his development. The third pair is probably Murphy and Seabrook...which is aWful...but you're overpaying each of them...so they play. The team has only two RHD's. No way do the two play together. Murphy is in the top 4. ugh.
|
|
|
Post by brendan on Jul 27, 2019 13:34:10 GMT
someone needs to get a murphdawg #5!!
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jul 27, 2019 14:56:09 GMT
someone needs to get a murphdawg #5!! How bout, you!?
|
|
|
Post by Giovi on Jul 27, 2019 16:26:34 GMT
Thats not the article i saw, but i did see Stans quotes somewhere else. Boqvist was making a pretty good case for himself to go to the next level, with his play the latter part of last season.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Jul 27, 2019 17:53:15 GMT
Boqvist can hang offensively, but there are two parts to being a defenseman in the NHL. He needs time to bulk up. I think he should do one more season in juniors and then a little time in Rockford next year before making the jump permanently.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jul 27, 2019 18:26:02 GMT
So then what is the 3rd pair? Gus and seabrook? Oh dear lord.
|
|
|
Post by jrsamu on Jul 27, 2019 20:44:09 GMT
If Boqvist is ready offensively, he can make an awful lot of mistakes and not be as bad defensively as Gustafsson. Not trying to rush him, but it's not like the benchmark to make the blue line defensively is that high. If Gus vastly improves his defense, it will be a nice problem to have.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jul 27, 2019 23:22:37 GMT
I don't think there is room for 2 totally 1 dimensional offensive dmen right now.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jul 27, 2019 23:38:53 GMT
I don't think there is room for 2 totally 1 dimensional offensive dmen right now. A large amount of pressure on Keith, Maatta, and deHann.
|
|
|
Post by brendan on Jul 28, 2019 5:46:29 GMT
dk seabrook de haan matta murphdawg gusto
koookkkokkk dalhstrom
whos benched in the top 6? unless theyre moving gusto.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jul 28, 2019 8:29:15 GMT
If everyone is healthy I'd send Koekkoek down to Rockford.
Keith - Murph de Haan - Maatta Gusto - Seabrook
Dahlstrom
What happened to de Haan's injury though? Wasn't he supposed to start on IR?
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jul 28, 2019 9:05:19 GMT
You cant seriously have seabs or Murphy on the top pair.
|
|