|
Post by lari on Aug 19, 2020 12:02:25 GMT
Click on who you want to see back. Or none at all. Or all of them.
|
|
|
Post by jrsamu on Aug 19, 2020 12:41:55 GMT
On all of these it really depends on "how much, how long." Considering Stan usually overpays, I'll take that into consideration.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Aug 19, 2020 12:43:12 GMT
Crow needs to come back (cheap) until they can find a Goalie.
|
|
|
Post by jrsamu on Aug 19, 2020 13:16:37 GMT
What is the likelihood that #50 will play injury-free through a season? Do you think Stan is capable of signing him to a 1-year deal that is not an gross overpay for what he will provide?
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Aug 19, 2020 13:50:40 GMT
What is the likelihood that #50 will play injury-free through a season? Do you think Stan is capable of signing him to a 1-year deal that is not an gross overpay for what he will provide? Corky can go 50% off or go home.
|
|
|
Post by stbhawks19 on Aug 19, 2020 13:57:07 GMT
Kubalik is the only one I’d want back strictly based on playing ability, but I cringe at the term and coin Stund will offer.
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Aug 19, 2020 14:23:02 GMT
Crow needs to come back (cheap) until they can find a Goalie. On the cheap, yes. It's a few years away from relevance for the team so why not stem the tide until someone better comes along or is (lololol) drafted.
Caggula on a small salary for a year won't offend me. Kubalik yes but PLEASE not at six milz a year Stan, you moron. Strome can go, I don't think he fetches even a decent draft pick if he signs with someone else.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Aug 19, 2020 14:29:24 GMT
Kubalik for sure...other than that...ugh.
Strome and Caggiula on team friendly deals, meh, ok. The rest are garbage.
If they can get crow for a year, 2 max, on the cheap, I'd consider it. Only because they have sweet fuck all in the entire pipeline.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Aug 19, 2020 15:39:15 GMT
Kubalik for sure...other than that...ugh. Strome and Caggiula on team friendly deals, meh, ok. The rest are garbage. If they can get crow for a year, 2 max, on the cheap, I'd consider it. Only because they have sweet fuck all in the entire pipeline. Perhaps Askarov slips to 16-17? Nah. Get Daws or Commesso in Rd 3.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Aug 19, 2020 15:44:55 GMT
Kubalik is the only one I’d want back strictly based on playing ability, but I cringe at the term and coin Stund will offer. What option does he have? The hammer? Trade his rights? Kubalik can fuck the Hawks pretty badly in the next few months, if he so desires. Stan will surely offer him the number his agent wants. Prepare to cringe.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Aug 19, 2020 16:20:47 GMT
Strome on a one year deal makes sense for both parties. He showed some flashes in the playoffs, but I’m not sure his skating can be fixed.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Aug 19, 2020 16:22:44 GMT
Actually I thought 68 played pretty well. Good option for the 3rd pair going forward or until a kid supplants him.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Aug 19, 2020 16:34:24 GMT
I also voted yes for Koekkoek. He seems low maintenance and can be third pair or 7th D. Hawks don't have much depth defensively.
There's Keith, Murphy and De Haan. And Maatta, unless he can be dumped now that he scored all those goals in the playoffs.
Could use a couple more options.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Aug 19, 2020 17:03:09 GMT
I also voted yes for Koekkoek. He seems low maintenance and can be third pair or 7th D. Hawks don't have much depth defensively. There's Keith, Murphy and De Haan. And Maatta, unless he can be dumped now that he scored all those goals in the playoffs. Could use a couple more options. with size and attitude.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Aug 19, 2020 17:13:30 GMT
I also voted yes for Koekkoek. He seems low maintenance and can be third pair or 7th D. Hawks don't have much depth defensively. There's Keith, Murphy and De Haan. And Maatta, unless he can be dumped now that he scored all those goals in the playoffs. Could use a couple more options. with size and attitude. Is Byfuglien still alive?
|
|