|
Post by jimc on Dec 6, 2017 15:31:08 GMT
BOOOOOOOOOOOO
|
|
|
Post by lari on Dec 7, 2017 17:52:01 GMT
Well, that didn't work out. What next?
Remember the Hawks are on a five game losing streak, and 12th in the conference.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Dec 7, 2017 17:55:42 GMT
Well, that didn't work out. What next? Remember the Hawks are on a five game losing streak, and 12th in the conference. Top 10 pick, here we come!!!
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Dec 7, 2017 18:01:38 GMT
Well, that didn't work out. What next? Remember the Hawks are on a five game losing streak, and 12th in the conference. That can't be right. NHL.com says the Hawks are only on a 2 game losing streak.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Dec 8, 2017 4:23:59 GMT
Top 5 pick would be better. Stan better be selling whatever he can at the deadline. Every draft pick counts at this point.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Dec 8, 2017 4:25:13 GMT
Well, that didn't work out. What next? Remember the Hawks are on a five game losing streak, and 12th in the conference. I see what happened. Stan got word of the new rule changes for hooking and slashing and he also thought that lowest point total wins like in golf.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Dec 8, 2017 13:38:46 GMT
Top 5 pick would be better. Stan better be selling whatever he can at the deadline. Every draft pick counts at this point. HEY! Our boys have too much pride to fall to the bottom!
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Dec 8, 2017 13:54:06 GMT
Top 5 pick would be better. Stan better be selling whatever he can at the deadline. Every draft pick counts at this point. HEY! Our boys have too much pride to fall to the bottom! I dunno about that. They've played like Bottoms quite a bit this year. Washington making them their bitch is the most recent example.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Dec 8, 2017 14:11:04 GMT
Here is a fun thought...
Even if the hawks were able to secure a lottery pick, Stan Bowman would be the one making it...
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Dec 8, 2017 14:18:58 GMT
Stop that. (Though it's a true concern if they were to pick in the 5-15 range, AND the top 4 were "no-brainers". It's the grey area after that that challenges Stan's Grey matter...)
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Dec 8, 2017 14:40:06 GMT
Stop that. (Though it's a true concern if they were to pick in the 5-15 range, AND the top 4 were "no-brainers". It's the grey area after that that challenges Stan's Grey matter...) Don't you worry about Stan...He'll find the Cam Barker in this draft.
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Dec 8, 2017 15:43:33 GMT
Cam Barker was not one I blame on anyone, incompetent or not. Consensus number 3. Just bad luck they lost the draft lottery.
Bad luck is relative though. Never would have got Capt. and Kane if they had got Ovie or Gino.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Dec 8, 2017 15:54:56 GMT
I am much more worried about him unearthing the next Alexandre Daigle or Patrick Stefan
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Dec 8, 2017 16:19:04 GMT
Cam Barker was not one I blame on anyone, incompetent or not. Consensus number 3. Just bad luck they lost the draft lottery. Bad luck is relative though. Never would have got Capt. and Kane if they had got Ovie or Gino.
Hm. Could they have had Malkin & Toews instead? Is that a better team?
The Hawks, without Malkin, finished with 65 points. The Capitals were at 70 points.
Does Malkin get this team an additional 5 points in the standings?
www.hockey-reference.com/teams/CHI/2006.html#skaters::4
|
|
|
Post by soccer24 on Dec 8, 2017 16:20:19 GMT
I get it though. It's hard to say what would be better than a team that won 3 Cups in such a short time span. (as much as we may like to ridicule that for other reasons.)
|
|