|
|
Post by lari on Jun 5, 2019 16:20:08 GMT
The house is on fire again! You can only save one. But which one?!
|
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Jun 5, 2019 16:29:47 GMT
I think I go for a beer and let it burn.
|
|
|
|
Post by jrsamu on Jun 5, 2019 16:58:29 GMT
I would have voted for Forsling, but he had the unique ability to make every defenseman he was paired with look worse with him than without him. Unless it was "man-to-man defense brain lock" that can be corrected, we do not need any more defensemen who cannot defend. We are allowed one, and only because he was an offensive animal last year.
We probably didn't see enough of Koekkoek, but I find it hard to believe the Lightning would have jettisoned him if they saw that light at the end of the tunnel.
So Dahlstrom...
|
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jun 5, 2019 18:08:55 GMT
Forsling is fucking garbage...Koekkoek aspires to be garbage.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jun 5, 2019 18:10:40 GMT
I vote Davidson...he at least has trade value! Not a single one of those turds is an NHL player...honestly...I might take RUNDBLAD over a couple of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by brendan on Jun 5, 2019 18:42:38 GMT
echo these lads. none are even a maybe imo...
give someone else the time and space.
|
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jun 5, 2019 19:28:57 GMT
'We' have many in the pipeline..Let these burn.
|
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jun 5, 2019 20:14:30 GMT
I like Dahlstrom the best because he brings something the Hawks don't have otherwise. He is a big defensive d-man. Mind you, not especially good at what he does, but he's more useful than multiples of the same player the other depth d-men seem to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jun 6, 2019 1:53:19 GMT
I like Dahlstrom the best because he brings something the Hawks don't have otherwise. He is a big defensive d-man. Mind you, not especially good at what he does, but he's more useful than multiples of the same player the other depth d-men seem to be. Dahlstrom turns like me. 'nuff said. |
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jun 6, 2019 2:52:06 GMT
I like Dahlstrom the best because he brings something the Hawks don't have otherwise. He is a big defensive d-man. Mind you, not especially good at what he does, but he's more useful than multiples of the same player the other depth d-men seem to be. Dahlstrom turns like me. 'nuff said. ...into a raging faggot after 3 drinks? |
|
|
|
Post by Giovi on Jun 6, 2019 3:09:57 GMT
Dahlstrom turns like me. 'nuff said. ...into a raging faggot after 3 drinks? At least it takes him 3 drinks..... |
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jun 6, 2019 13:14:54 GMT
...into a raging faggot after 3 drinks? At least it takes him 3 drinks..... Uh....Thanks? |
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jun 6, 2019 14:45:37 GMT
haaaaaaa
it only takes Ken a furtive glance!
|
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jun 6, 2019 16:20:01 GMT
haaaaaaa it only takes Ken a furtive glance! a look at some fur?? |
|
|
|
Post by Pain101 on Jun 9, 2019 16:15:51 GMT
Koo Koo isn't the sum of his parts but he's still young enough to put it together. Forsling has the most trade value IMO so I'd move him and give Koo Koo this year to prove he belongs. Davidson can go away. Dahlstrom needs to learn to skate before bring included in hockey discussions.
|
|
