|
|
Post by khawk20 on Mar 26, 2024 10:19:37 GMT
Both teams playing out the string. Might be decent, but who knows.
Maybe Bedard will pot a couple. Gotta be a fight or two maybe.
…are we getting Taylor hall back this year? He’s skating. I don’t want to see him until next season, he’s way too breakable.
Flamers 5 Hawks 4
|
|
|
|
Post by dhull10 on Mar 26, 2024 16:12:24 GMT
Cal-Ga-Ree ain't no great shakes. Hawks should win this at Home.
|
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Mar 26, 2024 16:54:48 GMT
Go Hawks.
|
|
|
|
Post by lari on Mar 26, 2024 17:27:38 GMT
I want them to win out from here on and piss off all the lottery ball turncoats.
And then of course win the lottery. Not a terribly unlikely scenario, aside from the Hawks winning out of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Mar 27, 2024 4:02:36 GMT
Played pretty good
Mrazek easily the best. Slaggert gets 2 apples. Kaiser on ice at the end
|
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Mar 27, 2024 5:00:43 GMT
Oh, and Wiedeman instead of Vosters. That was great.
|
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Mar 27, 2024 10:06:01 GMT
Oh, and Wiedeman instead of Vosters. That was great. Oh no way! It was on sportsnet here so I just watched the Canadian guys, who were fine. Go figure I miss a night off from Vosters.  Don’t see something like Slaggart’s non-goal happen quite like that very often. Tough luck. |
|
|
|
Post by dhull10 on Mar 27, 2024 11:42:47 GMT
Wiedman is great, why he didn't get the TV gig is puzzling but he is awesome on radio. Hey, are The Hawks starting to build a foundation here? 8 goals last 2 games albeit against not great teams but Bedard only had 2 assists so others are stepping up. Mr. Jones starting to earn his paycheck.
|
|
|
|
Post by stbhawks19 on Mar 27, 2024 13:32:51 GMT
100% agree, tuned in early in the 3rd and it was such a pleasant surprise to hear him over corporate AI based Vosters, especially once you’re able to tune out anything Pang says.
There’s no reason whatsoever that it shouldn’t be Wiedeman full time. Does Vosters even have any hockey background whatsoever? From what I heard from a friend in the know he doesn’t, which begs the question how he ever got the job in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Mar 27, 2024 14:18:52 GMT
100% agree, tuned in early in the 3rd and it was such a pleasant surprise to hear him over corporate AI based Vosters, especially once you’re able to tune out anything Pang says. There’s no reason whatsoever that it shouldn’t be Wiedeman full time. Does Vosters even have any hockey background whatsoever? From what I heard from a friend in the know he doesn’t, which begs the question how he ever got the job in the first place. Wiedeman even made Panger easier to listen to. A hockey announcer,not a 'personality'. |
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Mar 27, 2024 18:32:02 GMT
Weideman is too old school for TV, he actually calls the play. I'd rather have him on the radio anyways, anyone listening to the game needs his ability to describe the play as it's happening. TV announcers (pretty much all of them) don't do that and don't feel the need to.
|
|
|
|
Post by lari on Mar 28, 2024 6:32:20 GMT
This was a really good game for the Slaggert - Dickinson - Anderson line. Good to see Dickinson get back to his scoring ways, but Slaggert can't buy a goal.
Mrazek was excellent. And the Hawks PP that started the game looked exceptionally good. It was just a matter of time until they scored.
|
|
