|
Post by stbhawks19 on Oct 5, 2018 17:46:22 GMT
Every time I saw Martinsen I thought it was Bickell. #29, same type of frame. Maybe one day the coach will let players like him hit.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Oct 5, 2018 19:54:37 GMT
Holy fuck are the Hawks bad. Pulled victory from the jaws of defeat against the lowly Sens.
I did call that Ward would be opening night starter the moment he was signed though.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Oct 5, 2018 19:59:24 GMT
When is the 30 for 30 what happened to Brandon Saad? Maybe he has caught what Crawford has?
|
|
|
Post by khawk20 on Oct 5, 2018 21:55:39 GMT
When is the 30 for 30 what happened to Brandon Saad? Maybe he has caught what Crawford has? He really does seem like a different guy from The one that was sent to Columbus, and definitely not in a good way.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Oct 5, 2018 23:03:34 GMT
When is the 30 for 30 what happened to Brandon Saad? Maybe he has caught what Crawford has? He really does seem like a different guy from The one that was sent to Columbus, and definitely not in a good way. Had 1 pre-season game where the puck followed him like in Saginaw. Unnoticeable vs. Sens
|
|
|
Post by dhull10 on Oct 6, 2018 14:02:17 GMT
Hawks theme song Living in The Past. I miss 72 very much.
|
|
|
Post by jrsamu on Oct 6, 2018 17:21:25 GMT
Hawks theme song Living in The Past. I miss 72 very much. Soon Columbus will be singing the same tune. Doubt the Hawks could have handled the next Panarin contract, then they'd be in Columbus' shoes. Without Saad. Hopefully #20 wakes up from his post-Hossa funk. The Hawks cannot afford that $6 million to be dead money.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Oct 6, 2018 18:16:33 GMT
They would have been better off just keeping 72 and trading him at the deadline this year.
|
|
|
Post by jrsamu on Oct 6, 2018 18:33:04 GMT
They would have been better off just keeping 72 and trading him at the deadline this year. Probably so, but I think I'd rather take Saad than rely on Stan to generate a quality return while under the gun.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Oct 6, 2018 19:51:04 GMT
They would have been better off just keeping 72 and trading him at the deadline this year. Probably so, but I think I'd rather take Saad than rely on Stan to generate a quality return while under the gun. Panarin probably would have fetched at least two failed former first round picks. David Rundblad & Tim Erixon, for instance.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Oct 6, 2018 20:09:45 GMT
You never know. They could just use a change of scenery.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Oct 6, 2018 20:11:13 GMT
They would have been better off just keeping 72 and trading him at the deadline this year. Probably so, but I think I'd rather take Saad than rely on Stan to generate a quality return while under the gun. Stan got a 1st and a good prospect for Ryan Hartman. I think even a monkey humping a doorknob could trade Panarin and get a 1st, 2nd, and a high level prospect without much effort.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Oct 6, 2018 20:16:03 GMT
Probably so, but I think I'd rather take Saad than rely on Stan to generate a quality return while under the gun. I think even a monkey humping a doorknob could trade Panarin and get a 1st, 2nd, and a high level prospect without much effort. Why are you bringing Mike Smith into this?
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Oct 6, 2018 20:27:06 GMT
I did not specify it was a Russian monkey so I'm not sure you have the right primate.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Oct 6, 2018 20:28:45 GMT
I did not specify it was a Russian monkey so I'm not sure you have the right primate. My bad. Smith wouldn't trade away a Russian.
|
|