|
Post by lari on Jan 19, 2019 15:30:27 GMT
The problem now is that the Hawks really don't have that many assets that other teams will want. Every playoff team would like to have Patrick Kane. He's a proven playoff performer. Some teams might sell their future to get over the top just once. Cody Glass (2017 5th overall pick - Eliteprospects profile) + David Clarkson (salary cap dump) for Pat Kane? Knights can trade Kane in the summer, if he isn't in their long term plan and get close to the same value back. A win-win trade like that is possible.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Jan 19, 2019 16:08:44 GMT
You're trading Kane for a single prospect and a salary cap dump? I'd do that with Toews in a heartbeat. Kane is worth two firsts and a top prospect at least.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jan 19, 2019 16:48:50 GMT
Kane is going to decline. If you're going to get more, then sure.
I'd much rather have prospects than picks though. Just accelerates the rebuild a couple of years, and you have at least a 1-2 more years of data on that player you're getting. Trading Kane for picks might result in getting nothing tangible. Kane can definitely warrant getting that "ready to hit the NHL" franchise player blue chip prospect, instead of having to go the draft route of acquiring that player.
If I'm trading Kane, I'd rather not roll the dice. I want the next Blackhawks star, as close to guaranteed as possible. Cody Glass is one of those players.
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jan 19, 2019 16:59:23 GMT
I KEEP HEARING HAWKS WILL SIGN PANARIN AND BOBROVSKY THIS SUMMER AND WIN THE CUP
FACEPALM
Bickell's deal was idiotic with or without MS...he was never any more than a 3rd liner who caught lightning in a bottle playing with 19 and 88...so fucking dumb. Trading away Teuvo just to make that contract go away was asinine
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jan 19, 2019 17:00:19 GMT
Kane is going to decline. If you're going to get more, then sure. I'd much rather have prospects than picks though. Just accelerates the rebuild a couple of years, and you have at least a 1-2 more years of data on that player you're getting. Trading Kane for picks might result in getting nothing tangible. Kane can definitely warrant getting that "ready to hit the NHL" franchise player blue chip prospect, instead of having to go the draft route of acquiring that player. If I'm trading Kane, I'd rather not roll the dice. I want the next Blackhawks star, as close to guaranteed as possible. Cody Glass is one of those players. NMC NMC NMC
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jan 19, 2019 17:02:39 GMT
Kane is going to decline. If you're going to get more, then sure. I'd much rather have prospects than picks though. Just accelerates the rebuild a couple of years, and you have at least a 1-2 more years of data on that player you're getting. Trading Kane for picks might result in getting nothing tangible. Kane can definitely warrant getting that "ready to hit the NHL" franchise player blue chip prospect, instead of having to go the draft route of acquiring that player. If I'm trading Kane, I'd rather not roll the dice. I want the next Blackhawks star, as close to guaranteed as possible. Cody Glass is one of those players. NMC NMC NMC
Kane, a single man, a playboy, would say NO to Las Vegas? He'd rather stay with a hopeless 31st place team (soon to be 32nd place team) that will only be good again after he has retired?
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jan 19, 2019 17:05:26 GMT
I KEEP HEARING HAWKS WILL SIGN PANARIN AND BOBROVSKY THIS SUMMER AND WIN THE CUP FACEPALM At this point I think it's more likely Kane goes to Columbus to play with Panarin than the other way around. Bobrovsky can come to Chicago and be the new Khabby. A drunk-ass Russian minding the net for a last place shitty Chicago team.
|
|
|
Post by Merpes on Jan 19, 2019 18:31:06 GMT
Kane, a single man, a playboy, would say NO to Las Vegas? He'd rather stay with a hopeless 31st place team (soon to be 32nd place team) that will only be good again after he has retired? Kane probably makes Vegas worse to be honest. The play a complete team game and Kane simply doesn't do the things that all the Vegas players do collectively as a unit in order for the sum to be greater than the individual parts.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jan 19, 2019 18:37:36 GMT
Kane, a single man, a playboy, would say NO to Las Vegas? He'd rather stay with a hopeless 31st place team (soon to be 32nd place team) that will only be good again after he has retired? Kane probably makes Vegas worse to be honest. The play a complete team game and Kane simply doesn't do the things that all the Vegas players do collectively as a unit in order for the sum to be greater than the individual parts. Probably true. I always found it odd how the Devils found use for Mogilny and won a Cup with him in 2000. But they did.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jan 19, 2019 19:02:06 GMT
Gallant would know how to handle Kane....And EVERYBODY can use a 100 pt guy...Kane is 29, and uninjured thus far. But you MUST get more than 1 prospect and 1 draft choice.
|
|
|
Post by lari on Jan 19, 2019 20:07:39 GMT
30. Kane is 30.
|
|
|
Post by ballz09 on Jan 20, 2019 0:30:06 GMT
I KEEP HEARING HAWKS WILL SIGN PANARIN AND BOBROVSKY THIS SUMMER AND WIN THE CUP FACEPALM Stop “dating” Russian men.
|
|
|
Post by gadi on Jan 20, 2019 4:02:54 GMT
Panarin showed when picked the Hawks initially that he's interested in being on a winning team. So that automatically precludes him from signing here as a UFA.
Hawks are only leaking that in the hope that armdancers will buy the idea that the Hawks are still relevant.
|
|
|
Post by garyu on Jan 20, 2019 4:29:45 GMT
FUCK! Cut him up for dog food!!
|
|
|
Post by jimc on Jan 20, 2019 7:44:13 GMT
I KEEP HEARING HAWKS WILL SIGN PANARIN AND BOBROVSKY THIS SUMMER AND WIN THE CUP FACEPALM Stop “dating” Russian men. You say it like it's a bad thing...
|
|